Dark days

The real achievements of the Gillard government are being overshadowed by Labor’s ineptness, argues Norman Abjorensen

26 August 2011

Print this article Print this article

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Above: Prime Minister Julia Gillard speaking during a media conference in Canberra yesterday, where she was questioned about the embattled government backbencher Craig Thomson.
Photo: Alan Porritt/ AAP Image

IF, as seems likely, the burgeoning scandals surrounding Labor MP Craig Thomson bring down the Gillard government and hand power to Tony Abbott, it will be a most unfortunate and undeserved end to the best government Australia has had in twenty years, but an outcome for which the Labor Party has only itself to blame.

The disproportionate role played by unions in the preselection process, and the preselection process itself, need to be revisited in light of the potential disaster looming as a result of a single injudicious preselection that was entirely avoidable.

Some of the allegations relating to use of a union credit card by Mr Thomson were already known to the party before the 2010 election, having been aired during a bitter union election campaign in the Health Services Union. There was ample opportunity for the party to investigate the allegations and satisfy itself that Mr Thomson was not a ticking time bomb. But, no, he was re-endorsed and subsequently re-elected.

This raises serious questions. Were the allegations ever investigated? If so, by whom and what was the outcome? If not, why not? Or was factional muscle brought to bear to keep a lid on the whole sordid affair? Can the electorate have confidence in the candidates selected and in the process used to select them?

Mr Thomson, it needs to be said, comes out of the NSW branch of the Labor Party, which – until it was decisively rejected by the voters in March – presided over the most inept, accident-prone and possibly corrupt administration the nation has ever seen (with the possible exception of the Bjelke-Petersen government in Queensland).

The very real dilemma for the prime minister, embattled as she is, is that she has had no politically realistic alternative to supporting the Member for Dobell, given the precarious numbers in parliament; but the longer the issue drags on, and the murkier it seems to get day by day, the more she and the government will suffer in the unforgiving court of public opinion.

Mr Thomson’s position is untenable, and by logical extension, so might be that of the government, whose very existence is tied to his fate. Whether Ms Gillard cuts him loose or he falls on his sword is irrelevant: a resignation, a by-election in a seat with a 5.1 per cent margin, and an inevitable Liberal victory are all lining up, potentially putting paid to the Labor era – which would end not with a bang, as in 1975, but rather with a pathetic and utterly sordid whimper.

A Liberal win in Dobell would mean a lower house made up of seventy-four Coalition MPs, seventy-one Labor, four independents and one Green. In a vote of no-confidence, independent Bob Katter will vote with the Coalition while Labor will be able to muster seventy (the Speaker excluded, as he does not have a vote in a division unless the vote is tied, in which case he exercises a casting vote) plus at most four others, making it seventy-five Coalition against seventy-four Labor. (It is uncertain whether the independents will support the government under the circumstances, but it matters not.) The government’s fate would be sealed. The most likely course of events from that point would be an election, as Mr Abbott would have difficulty governing after providing a Speaker, especially given the fact that a confidence vote requires more than half the members to succeed. With the state of the polls, the outcome of any election is a total no-brainer.

Tony Abbott is fond of calling this the worst government in history, but then he also believes in miracles. Under difficult circumstances, Labor has taken the bold step of addressing climate change, which is well and truly with us, but the opposition’s political opportunism has turned this boldness into a millstone. The government, for its part, has been far too modest in drawing attention to its successes.

History tells us that we respond more to no than to yes. Of the forty-four referendums since 1901, the mere eight that resulted in the affirmative were ones that enjoyed a rare bipartisan consensus. As long as there was a “no” voice, the people responded in the negative.

The broadband network is another bold step, harking back to nation-building of old when political leaders dared to dream, building the transcontinental railway, the Sydney Opera House and the Sydney Harbour Bridge and establishing enduring and vital institutions such as the ABC, the National Library and the Australian National University.

Labor has also shown commendable courage in taking on the powerful tobacco industry by bringing in some of the world’s most stringent packaging legislation and in daring to push the lucrative mining industry, more than 80 per cent foreign-owned, to leave some of its profits in Australia.

Perhaps more than anything else, the handling of the global financial crisis was both deft and effective, sparing the Australian much misery, and making our economic management the envy of the world.

Tony Abbott and his team have shown little in the way of policy development to inspire confidence. Mr Abbott’s knee-jerk policy pronouncements, often reversed or highly qualified in twenty-four hours – most recently his siding with farmers against the coal-seam gas industry – are chaotic in the extreme and the public service will be hard-pressed to give structure to such anarchy. And with the foreshadowed job cuts to the bureaucracy, there will be far fewer of them around to help out when they might most be needed.

The Rudd and Gillard ministries have, in general, been sound and talented. It is doubtful that an Abbott front bench will come anywhere near Labor in terms of calibre. Wayne Swan has been the hard man of government in a role that it is difficult to imagine Joe Hockey taking. Stephen Smith has handled defence and foreign affairs with a flair and skill that is unlikely to be emulated by David Johnston and Julie Bishop. The one Coalition frontbencher with policy nous and political smarts, Andrew Robb, might find himself both lonely and isolated.

And we come back to the Labor Party, which is about to enter one of its darkest periods for decades, having been savagely belted in New South Wales in March, where it is likely to be out of power for many years to come, and voted out of office in Victoria last year. Looming defeats in Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania paint a most dismal picture, and we have to ask why.

It is not an easy question to answer, and Labor’s hand-wringing over its near-death experience in 2010 has yielded little illumination. Political ineptness of an extraordinarily high order cost it government in New South Wales; in Victoria a competent yet insensitive government stood by as its support slowly ebbed away; Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania are similar, though each has different elements of political incompetence that just might have been averted or minimised with a more broadly based and wiser candidate selection.

Labor, for all its achievements, occupies a house much in need of order. Rebuilding rather than renovation will be required, and that will entail a process akin to civil war. But as Julia Gillard will be likely, it seems, to find out soon, the costs of not doing anything are exorbitant. •

Norman Abjorensen teaches public policy in the Crawford School of Economics and Government at ANU. He is co-author of
Australia: The State of Democracy.

Related articles

Follow Inside Story

Subscribe to Inside Story’s free weekly newsletter

Just enter your email address below, and make sure you click the confirmation link when you receive an automatic email from us:


  1. Kerry Kruger added this comment on 26 August 2011 | Permalink

    I do so agree. I feel sorry for the Labor Party because they are really tring to bring in some good policies. I am totally frustrated with the Liberal Party, especially Tony Abbott; he is their biggest handicap.

  2. Norman Abjorensen added this comment on 26 August 2011 | Permalink

    I should have added to the list of worthy achievements the National Disability Insurance Scheme which is visionary in scope and does much to restore Australia’s reputation, now somewhat diminished, as a leader in key areas of social welfare. There are, of course, downsides to this government, as there are to all, but most notably the continuation of the punitive NT intervention and the treatment of asylum seekers.

  3. Stephen Prowse added this comment on 26 August 2011 | Permalink

    An interesting article that portrays a visionary reforming labor party mixed with extraordinary ineptitude. There is no mention of some serious mistakes eg
    Dropping the planned ETS
    Removal of Kevin Rudd
    However a vote for Tony Abbot seems even more problematic

  4. Doug Evans added this comment on 22 September 2011 | Permalink

    What interests me now in a horrid trainwreck sort of way is What next? I am no friend of the repugnant current version of the Coalition. I acknowledge the individual talent in the Labor team often pointed to by commentators. I applaud the solid legislative record of the Gillard government. However I still have the sneaking feeling that despite all the above, the Rudd-Gillard government might just be remembered as the least competent Federal government in a half century.

    Every piece of sensible progressive legislation that quietly passes under the radar is drowned out by whatever the current unnecessary self inflicted disaster is. Asylum seekers, gay marriage why are either of these an issue at all? Mining Tax, action on climate change – solid sensible reforms poisoned by disgraceful campaigns of misinformation and the appalling inability of the government to let Australians know what the government has in mind and why.

    After four years in power Labor is still completely unable to communicate any vision for the nation, any semblance of a coherent agenda. Gillard’s speech rallying the troops to her idea of party reform and renewal poignantly underlines the impossibility of either, and the lid now seems to be coming off the hidden cronyism, corruption and mismanagement within the Union movement. Try as it undoubtedly will to distance itself from this mess the Parliamentary ALP will inevitably be singed with blowback from this.

    I’m afraid we are witnessing the destruction simultaneously from without and within of a once great and important political party. It took the ALP a very long time to come back from the split with the DLP and I fear the current crisis is at least as great.

    I personally don’t see a path for the ALP back to government in its own right as I think the left vote has irrevocably split. The Greens will not simply wither when the ALP decides to reclaim its social democratic credentials unless they descend into madness post Bob Brown. I would not be surprised if the ALP, with fewer members nationally now than a decent AFL Club, split into two small parties – Social Democrats and Liberal Democrats.

    The implosion of the ALP, if that is what is happening, is a tragedy for the country. But it is useless pretending, as is popular in some of the blogs I follow, that Federal Labor remains viable, that the electorate will wake up to Abbott and his henchmen, that the ALPs problems are largely caused by a hostile, lazy (or both) media and that Gillard et al are likely to compete effectively in 2013. This is pointless and flies in the face of the available evidence.

    The elephant in the room that no-one likes to talk about is the steady decay of Labor’s opinion polls (and Gillard’s approval ratings) over the year since Gillard won the election; from a 2pp vote of 50/50 to a current reading of 44/56 in favour of the coalition (Essential Media).No bumps or jumps, just a steady decline.

    Misha Schubert’s recent piece discussing Teflon Tony to whom no criticism sticks, no matter how potent, touched on something important. Politicians acquire this characteristic when the electorate stops listening to the other side of the argument and they have stopped listening to Julia Gillard.

    I fear that for a future progressive government to emerge requires that Labor first resolve its inner tensions either by splitting or (perhaps) in its desperation, turning on the right wing – whose idiotic meddling has brought the party to this pass – and then subduing the massive sense of entitlement that sets it at odds with the Greens.

    I don’t think this sort of renewal and acknowledgement of current realities is likely within the ALP but who knows? The recent Danish election provides a pointer to a possible path back to left-ish government in this country but is the ALP ready for a coalition of the left? I can’t see it.

Send us a comment

We welcome contributions about the issues covered in articles in Inside Story. We ask contributors to provide their full name for publication, but if for any reason you need to use a pseudonym please submit your comment to us via email. Because all comments are moderated, they will not appear immediately. Your email address is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *.