Temporary migration is a permanent thing

There is a debate to be had about 457 visas, writes Peter Mares, but it’s not the one we’ve been having

29 March 2013



Print this article Print this article

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Former immigration minister Chris Evans (above), who described how Australia’s system was shifting from “supply-driven” to “demand-driven.”
Photo: Patrick Hamilton/ AAP Image

The 457 visa system is a short-term temporary visa for skills shortages. If it’s being used for any other purpose by anyone, then it’s being used wrongly and we should stamp that out.
– Julia Gillard, Age, 18 March 2013

IF THE prime minister really thinks that the only purpose of the 457 visa is to fill temporary skills shortages then she should ask senior officials for a briefing about the evolution of Australia’s migration program over the past fifteen years.

That may have been the original intention of the 457 visa. Conceived when Paul Keating was prime minister but introduced after John Howard took office in 1996, it was supposed to give the domestic training system enough breathing space to catch up with the demand for qualified employees. The idea was that skills gaps would be plugged with temporary foreign workers while locals were trained to fill the positions in the longer term.

Things have worked out differently. The 457 visa has expanded into something much more significant – an essential component of a fundamentally changed approach to selecting skilled migrants.

When Senator Chris Evans was immigration minister under Kevin Rudd, he described the change as a shift from a “supply-driven” to a “demand-driven” system. Rather than qualified migrants putting up their hands to come to Australia and then seeking appropriate employment after they arrive, business recruits directly from overseas. Rather than public servants in Canberra attempting to predict which skills the economy will require next year, business hires the foreign workers it needs, as and when it needs them.

Initially, this relatively new class of workers arrives on temporary visas, but in the ideal scenario things work out well on both sides. The temporary worker becomes a valued member of staff, enjoys the job and the lifestyle, and decides to build a future in Australia. After two or three years, the employer sponsors a transition to permanent residency.

In many cases, this is indeed what happens. Almost 40 per cent of 457 visa holders have gone on to become permanent residents. Or, to look at the statistics in another way, about half of the skilled migrants granted permanent residency last financial year were already living here on a temporary basis, mostly as migrant workers on 457 visas or as international students who had graduated from Australian universities and colleges. (In fact the two categories overlap, since an increasing number of international students move to 457 visas after graduation.)

The number of permanent migrants sponsored annually by employers has grown from around 10,000 in 2003–04 to more than 45,000 today. It’s no accident that about 80 per cent of these migrants are already living and working in Australia; the figure reflects a calculated shift towards demand-driven skilled migration via a two-step process – first temporary and then permanent residence.

There are many arguments in favour of this two-step process, which is also referred to as “try before you buy” or “suck it and see” migration. It provides a much more flexible and immediate response to the changing needs of employers (including state and territory governments, who are big users of 457 visa holders in their hospitals). Foreign workers are recruited directly into jobs that match their skills and experience, avoiding the situation in which they come to Australia independently, fail to find work in their profession, and end up in a lower-skilled job.

Two-step migration also acts as an additional test of the quality of migrants’ skills. If the performance of 457 visa holders fails to match their qualifications and experience then their presence in the workplace – and in Australia – really is likely to be temporary. Finally, the two-step system gives migrants an opportunity to check out life and work in Australia before they confront the monumental decision of whether to move permanently to a new country.

Those are the largely positive features of the temporary migration two-step. But there are unresolved problems as well.

Trade unions have raised concerns about the exploitation of workers on temporary visas and the potential for them to undermine established wages and conditions. Abuses undoubtedly do occur, even if they are the exceptions rather than the rule. A quick trawl through media releases from the Fair Work Ombudsman throws up numerous cases of foreign nationals being underpaid and overworked. But the system is better than it was prior to reforms in 2009 which, among other things, introduced a market-based minimum salary. Now, overseas workers must be paid at or above prevailing local wages; previously, the government set a baseline salary that could fall below the wages commanded by workers in specific industries.

Further tweaking could improve the system. It would make sense, for instance, to give fair work inspectors the power to check immigration paperwork to ensure that 457 visa holders are being employed in the skilled jobs for which they were recruited.

The potential for exploitation is inherent in the temporary migration system, particularly with the emphasis falling more heavily on employer sponsorship as a necessary step on the pathway from temporary migrant to permanent resident. As industrial relations commissioner Barbara Deegan found in her review of the integrity of the 457 visa system in 2008, an employer’s power to give or withhold support for permanent residency can make temporary migrants particularly vulnerable to “substandard living conditions, illegal or unfair deductions from wages, and other similar forms of exploitation.”

If their job situation becomes untenable and 457 visa holders decide to resign, they have only twenty-eight days to find an alternative employer before they lose the right to stay in Australia. Commissioner Deegan suggested extending the grace period to ninety days. This simple way to help temporary migrant workers stand up to exploitation appears not to be on the government’s agenda.

The other concern expressed by some trade unions, and more recently by the prime minister, is that use of the 457 visa has resulted in “foreign workers being put at the front of the queue with Australian workers at the back.” Beyond a vague statement on the immigration department’s website that the “457 program has expanded well above the national employment growth rate” and that “the nature of the program’s use by some employers indicates that the criteria is [sic] not being fully met,” little evidence has been offered to support this contention. The changes being rolled out in response to the government’s newfound concern about the 457 visa involve a series of technical adjustments rather than any fundamental rethink of the scheme.

There is, for example, no move to introduce a systematic process of labour-market testing to check whether skills shortages actually exist in a particular area. The Department of Immigration and Citizenship argues that the extra cost of recruiting offshore means that employers will employ qualified local workers first. Complications can arise, though, when a contractor recruits staff for a project in a remote area where skills are clearly in short supply and then redeploys them to a metropolitan area where the extent of skills shortages is hotly contested. (This appears to have been part of the sequence of events behind recent picket lines and protests at a construction site in Werribee.)

Employers say that they use 457 visas when no suitable local candidates are available. If this is the case and temporary migrants take positions that would otherwise go unfilled, then it is more likely that they are enabling enterprises to expand, creating additional jobs rather than displacing local workers. And temporary workers spend money on goods and services, which also generates local employment.

THE shift to temporary migration also raises a longer-term issue. The permanent migration program is capped. The temporary migration program is not. While government sets an annual limit on the number of permanent residency visas, business can bring in as many temporary skilled workers as it needs. What happens if the number of 457 visas grows to such an extent that the number of temporary workers seeking residency exceeds the number of permanent places on offer?

In the last financial year, the number of skilled workers granted temporary visas to work in Australia was almost exactly equal to the number granted permanent residency (125,000). If temporary migration overtakes permanent migration over a sustained period then there is a risk of an accumulating level of unmet demand for residency. We could see a growing backlog of 457 visa holders – people living and working in Australia who want to become residents, but for whom there is no room in the annual quota.

In such a situation the federal government could always increase the permanent migration intake – but the politics of immigration being what they are, there is no guarantee that this would happen. As a result, 457 visa holders could wait quite some time for their applications for permanent residency to be processed.

This is exactly what happened to tens of thousands of international students who met the criteria for permanent residency but found themselves stuck in a processing limbo because there were too few places in the migration program and their applications had been assessed as low priority. At the start of this financial year there were 143,000 applicants for permanent residency already in the processing pipeline, equal to more than an entire year’s intake.

This raises more fundamental questions. How long is it acceptable for someone to live, work and pay taxes in Australia but be denied government-funded services, including free medical care or schooling for their children? How long is it acceptable for someone to live, work and pay taxes in Australia but have no right to vote or run for office? At what point do we say that someone has contributed enough or developed a sufficient attachment to this country that he or she should no longer be treated as an outsider? There are no simple answers to these questions. Now that the temporary two-step is a permanent feature of the migration program, however, these are also issues we need to debate. •

Peter Mares is an adjunct fellow at the Swinburne Institute for Social Research.

Related articles

Follow Inside Story

Subscribe to Inside Story’s free weekly newsletter

Just enter your email address below, and make sure you click the confirmation link when you receive an automatic email from us:



6 Comments

  1. Tim Dymond added this comment on 27 March 2013 | Permalink

    Peter you have not mentioned the issues of training or apprenticeships anywhere in this article. The National Resources Sector Taskforce a couple of years ago found that the resources industry, despite its huge demand for technical and trades workers, made hardly any investment in training up skilled workers. Instead their first resort was and still is to use subclass 457 (and subclass 456) visas to provide such workers.

    The use of temporary labour schemes is a way for big companies to avoid commitments to skilling up local workers. This is a key reason why the use of such visas breeds cynicism. People graduating from high school who do not want to go to university used to have the ‘tradie’ option, but that will and is rapidly closing if all employers need to do is recruit overseas labour. You can see the additional advantage, as your article outlines, in that temporary foreign labour schemes create a divided docile workforce, whereas a trained resident workforce would be demanding better working conditions. This is why government needs to act to close the 457 visa ‘free lunch’ and force employers to invest in training.

  2. Tony Simons added this comment on 27 March 2013 | Permalink

    Excellent article. The cut backs to funding to TAFE and universities is scandalous. Also there should be much better tax incentives for companies to employ apprentices and trainees.

  3. Peter Mares added this comment on 28 March 2013 | Permalink

    Tim, I agree with you that I should have discussed training. I did intend to but space and time got the better of me.

    Businesses that get approval to use 457 visas have to have a certain record of training and have to commit to ongoing training of domestic workers, though this can be done in the form of contributions to a local registered training authority rather than in house. The changes to the 457 program announced by the government in late February are also designed to “clarify that an employer’s obligation to train Australians is ongoing and binding for the duration of their approved sponsorship, including for newly established business”. Also, where 457 workers bring higher skills to an enterprise, this is likely to have a spillover effect on existing staff.

    Having said all that I would like to see some serious research on the impact of the 457 program on domestic training to assess whether offshore recruitment is indeed providing an easier route than training for employers to meet skills shortages, if not in all cases then perhaps in some sectors. More importantly, if we want to increase workforce participation in Australia then we need to work much harder at assisting the long-term unemployed and other disadvantaged groups into work. These are not generally people who have the skills, qualifications or confidence to step into most of the jobs filled by 457 workers. The TAFE system is an essential part of this task.

  4. Cynthia Dearin added this comment on 3 April 2013 | Permalink

    Great article, Peter. I’d be interested to hear you thoughts on how proposed changes to the s457 scheme will affect Australia’s exporters.

    I think it is also important to make the public aware of the Senate Enquiry into the 457 scheme. Concerned organisations and individuals should be using this opportunity to participate in the parliamentary process and have their views heard, by making a submission to the enquiry.

  5. Jan Forrester added this comment on 4 April 2013 | Permalink

    Hi and thanks for a great article Peter. Taking other comments into account I wonder how this all fits in with the increasing casualisation of our workforce, now at about 1:5 across a range of industries. What I see is decreasing employee security, skills training, wages, ‘voice’. And what are strategies resulting from the insecure work investigation by the ACTU?
    How will this work towards a real response to the post-minerals boom in terms of new services/industry development? And engagement with Asia?
    The PM’s call to ‘protection’ of Australian workers seems a pathetic echo of 19th century White Australia. Irony is I hear one of her senior advisers is on a 457.

  6. Chandra Shah added this comment on 9 April 2013 | Permalink

    Interesting work Peter. The ICT sector has had significant supply of 457 and over a much longer period than other occupations. It would be interesting to look at the impact on the sector as a result of this. I believe domestic students are staying away from enrolling in ICT courses because of poorer work conditions which has come about because of the flooding of the sector with 457 around the dotcom bubble era. The supply of 457, together with offshoring, is suppressing working conditions in the sector. An interesting paper by Weinstein may be worth a look:
    Weinstein, E 2002, ‘Migration for the benefit of all: Towards a new paradigm for economic immigration’, International Labour Review, vol. 141, pp. 225-252.

    Based on some work I had done some time ago:

    Increased migration, especially temporary migration, may have added to the oversupply and in decline in wage growth in some areas of the ICT sector. Under certain conditions, migration, and in particular temporary migration, has the potential to reduce domestic supply of labour. This is because migration over a certain level can begin to have an impact on wages and conditions of work in the sector. As domestic labour flees from the sector, a dependency on migrant labour develops within the sector. This can put the local training market under considerable stress.

    The proportion of ICT workers born overseas increased from 36.3 percent in 2002 to 38.6 per cent in 2006. In comparison, the Australian workforce as a whole has about 25 per cent overseas-born workers.

    Enrolments in IT and engineering courses declined significantly—6 per cent per year in IT and 2 per cent per year in engineering. The fall in enrolments in IT courses has been particularly large since 2004. Large falls are also recorded in engineering courses although the change from 2006 to 2007 was only 2 per cent.

    An increasing proportion of the enrolment in IT and engineering courses is by non-resident students. The non-resident student share of enrolments in IT courses increased 12 percentage points to 51 per cent in 2007 and in engineering 18 percentage points to 41 per cent.
    At the postgraduate level, non-resident student enrolment was even higher—69 per cent in IT and 57 per cent in engineering courses in 2007.

    Relative earnings of computer professionals declined relative to other professionals after the dotcom bubble. In 2006, the ABS reported earnings of computer professionals increased 18 per cent from 2000 to 2006 compared to 33 per cent for all professionals.

Send us a comment

We welcome contributions about the issues covered in articles in Inside Story. We ask contributors to provide their full name for publication, but if for any reason you need to use a pseudonym please submit your comment to us via email. Because all comments are moderated, they will not appear immediately. Your email address is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *.

*
*