Why we need music

The most abstract of our arts is also one of the things that defines our humanity, writes Andrew Ford

08 May 2012



Print this article Print this article

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Photo: Petur/ Flickr

TODAY’s managers are always wanting to “outsource” things. They talk about savings and partnerships and choice, while really they are trying to rid themselves of responsibility. If something has been outsourced, it is not the manager’s fault when it fails. In seeking to find “efficiencies,” whether in a hospital or a music school, the managers must recruit collaborators from within. You can spot these people fairly easily in music. They are the ones who refer cheerfully to the “music business” – even the “music industry” – and who speak of “outcomes.” Real musicians don’t talk like that, though sometimes, when trying to communicate with managers, they do edit themselves.

The trouble is that most managers have experience only of management, the bulk of our politicians have spent their whole lives in politics, and too many of our economists can do little more than count. When musicians talk to these people, then, we bang on about how music makes children smarter, how it generates jobs and how it boosts the economy. Now I dare say all these things are true, but we speak in such terms principally because we think we may be heard. The most important reason for the proper funding of music and music education lies elsewhere and is harder to convey.

The arts in general are how we explain ourselves to each other and to future generations. Music is a unique and fundamental element of this, because being non-verbal, non-pictorial and, to all intents and purposes, non-representational, it is the most abstract of our arts. This is its chief glory. But when it comes to people who like to weigh and measure things, and talk about efficiencies and outcomes, it is also a weakness.

Because it is not possible to translate music into words (we can only, like Samuel Beckett, try to “fail better” in this regard), it follows that it is hard to say what music is for. Even the Harvard linguist Steven Pinker doesn’t seem to get it: he listens to music and experiences “auditory cheesecake.” Taken at this level, music will seem trivial, a soundtrack we can turn up or ignore at will, giving it the thumbs up or thumbs down according to how it makes us feel.

Well music is more than that. Some of history’s greatest minds have expressed themselves sonically. Hildegard of Bingen and J.S. Bach, Haydn and Mozart, Beethoven and Wagner, Bartók and Thelonious Monk: these people didn’t just serve up pleasing sounds for our amusement, they thought in music and thought deeply. When we listen to their work, we are plugging in to a form of philosophical discourse. Indeed, “plugging in” is arguably too passive a phrase, because if we are really listening to music we are participating in it. The music is being made in our imaginations.

In order to understand music, we must be able to think musically, and this is a talent that most of us can acquire at some level. With physics, you won’t get on with the advanced stuff if you have failed to understand the basics, but with music you can jump in anywhere. If you find the water too chilly, you can always get out and try again later – or try somewhere else. Eventually you are likely to find something that holds your attention and this, in turn, will lead you to another piece of music and another. Most people get this far.

The next step is to find yourself listening to music you don’t like or understand, reasoning that with a little persistence on your part the piece in question will begin to reveal its secrets. Surprisingly often, it does. If you’ve come this far, you are, I believe, a musical person, even a musician of sorts, engaging with music at quite a profound level, participating in musical thinking.

The next level involves playing and singing, improvising and composing. Indeed in many of the world’s more musically advanced cultures – I’m thinking particularly of Africa – this comes first. Making up our own music and performing it is how we truly engage with our musical traditions and how we preserve and critique and nurture them. These traditions are fundamental, and this is why music must be a basic part of the national curriculum, why we need properly funded music schools that put music – not the “music business” – at the centre of their activities, and why the arts are not an optional extra for governments in the good times.

Music is one of those things that defines our humanity. Indeed, it defines the best of us. In one or more of its various forms, music is present in most of our lives and, at some level, essential to our cultures. You might say that music is society’s soul. So it is the job of managers, politicians and economists to ensure its health. If these people can’t do their jobs, of course they should be replaced. •

Composer Andrew Ford is presenter of The Music Show on ABC Radio National.

Related articles

Follow Inside Story

Subscribe to Inside Story’s free weekly newsletter

Just enter your email address below, and make sure you click the confirmation link when you receive an automatic email from us:



5 Comments

  1. Sanchia Norman added this comment on 9 May 2012 | Permalink

    Nice article! But speaking as a manager who’s also a musician, I have to pull you up on a specific point which perhaps illustrates rather well how musicians and managers fundamentally misunderstand and mis-communicate.

    Outsourcing in management is absolutely not about handing on responsibility to someone else. It’s merely about acknowledging that sometimes outside companies can fulfil particular tasks more cheaply or more professionally (ie their skill-set is greater) than in-house staff. Any decent manager who outsources work is still responsible for making sure that that work gets done….he’s now just managing its delivery by a supplier instead of an employee – not necessarily an easier option, in fact often it’s much more challenging.

    Personally, I still hold out a lot of hope that justification for musical activities can be substantially better expressed in business (as well as emotional and philosophical) terms and thus attract more funding from global industry. The fault for this lies on both sides – my experience (I’m afraid) is that musicians are often just as adversely judgemental of business people as the other way around. Once this inclination is reversed, everyone has a lot more chance of making progress.

  2. Tim Gerwing added this comment on 15 May 2012 | Permalink

    Thanks for your very well-written article. I addressed some similar points in a recent blog post of my own: http://lascaux21.com/40/art-and-language/.

    Music is important because it helps us communicate about places that words can’t because words are Lego blocks. Music is finer, and can reach into subtler places. But I think you’re bang on the money when you say this is what makes it hard to “justify” from a material point of view. And, this is the great misfortunate: the arts in general are often judged by the very things they were meant to reach beyond.

  3. Quentin Grant added this comment on 21 May 2012 | Permalink

    Thank you for your very fine article, that thoughtfully articulates the intrinsic value of music – of that shared space that magically crosses borders of geography and of time to find a place in people’s souls.

    Rilke, in ‘To Music’ writes: “Music: breathing of statues. Perhaps: silence of paintings. You language where all language ends. . . .You stranger: music. You heart-space grown out of us’. . . .

  4. John Malcolm added this comment on 22 May 2012 | Permalink

    With great respect for the writer, and having enjoyed the article very much, I have to say I did not find the actual explanation of why we need music. Perhaps reasons are given for why we might want music. I did read that the question implied in the title is difficult question to answer, and also read a discussion of the levels of understanding of music.

    I believe music is inescapable, and find the question similar to asking why a drop of water needs the ocean. I honestly think I can write a more satisfactory response to the question in terms of existentialism, physics, and sympathetic resonance.

    I would welcome the opportunity to contribute, but it seems one has to be famous. ;-)

  5. Bill Bettcher added this comment on 7 August 2012 | Permalink

    I am a musician also but I find it disconcerting to find groups so enamored with their passion that they fail to recognize the value of other disciplines and even have the temerity to relegate the diversity of human disciplines to a care taking status for the fancied “holy grail”. Such “more intellectual than thou” attitudes very often turn away the contributions of rational, even tempered individuals. Maybe if we musicians were more skilled at communicating the abstract subtleties of our music it would have a more universal comprehension rather than being relegated to an elitist club.

5 Trackbacks

  1. [...] I couldn’t agree more with Andrew Ford, Australian composer and ABC Radio presenter, with this point he made in an article published today: ‘Why We Need Music‘. [...]

  2. [...] From a short essay by Andrew Ford (via Alex Ross) Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This [...]

  3. [...] ‘Why we need music‘ by Andrew Ford (via Alex Ross) Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]

  4. [...] yesterday’s reminder came in the shape of an article titled simply ‘Why we need music‘. There’s already an excess of writing worrying over the demise of an artistic [...]

  5. [...] audience to listen actively, critically, or intelligently. Alex Ross recently posted the link to an essay by the Australian composer Andrew Ford that discusses this theme and I’ll leave you with the [...]

Send us a comment

We welcome contributions about the issues covered in articles in Inside Story. We ask contributors to provide their full name for publication, but if for any reason you need to use a pseudonym please submit your comment to us via email. Because all comments are moderated, they will not appear immediately. Your email address is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *.

*
*